Of course the latest demonstration is that the "War" has ended in American macroeconomics. Bringing forth the murder and illegal application of the Trading with the Enemy Act (TWEA) in 1933, publishing it on PACER and then finding it "Omitted". I am presenting the Gospel of Pragmatism as it is published on PACER and closely the rendition presented to Jim in late 2014 like in the video.
.
.
.
I still wish I had recorded that broadcast of George W. describing his prayer encounter.
As we start the Torah in a Messianic Synagogue I am finding that the congregants are still denying that Abraham and Sarah were half-siblings.It may not be accurate that Isaac was pubescent when Abraham was heeding the drive to terminate him. But just the same, the anthropomorphism to project such insecurities on God as to need such an act to confirm Abraham's faith becomes even more absurd the more I study.
Dr. Rick STRASSMAN has been invaluable even though I only have a couple comments from short conversations. His work expressed in the two books confirms that phsychotomimetic drug induced displacement hysteria is at the heart of Rapture eschatology too. The Isle of Patmos had a rye ergot infection in the grain supply, I am convinced. Another thing on my mind lately is that the complexity of a lysergic acid diethylemide molecule might mean that it is not a direct hallucinogen but rather it causes the excessive secretion of DMT.
.
.
Here are some links to buy the DMT books:
https://www.amazon.com/DMT-Molecule-.../dp/0892819278
https://www.amazon.com/DMT-Soul-Prop...FGEYCJ936QRMHD
I believe that this is the far more common rendition of A Course in Miracles, with paragraph and sentence numbers. Because of the origins in hallucinosis I prefer discussing ACIM in groups:
https://www.amazon.com/Course-Miracl...in+miracles%27
I have since learned that "John" was John GITTINGER, not Kenneth WAPNICK. This is quite fascinating validation too, how important a role ACIM played in developing profiling as we know it today. These two pioneers are scarcely associated with ACIM but they played important roles in ego mapping and also in Personality Assessment Systems. After over five years of studying ACIM for three hours a week I see clearly how Bill's and John's dosing Helen with LSD was a productive scientific experiment, all judgment aside.
.
.
In 1951, Bill began to work with John Gittinger to develop the Personality Assessment System (or PAS). In 1958, Helen joined him under a grant at Columbia College School of Physicians and Surgeons. Unlike the Myers-Briggs questionnaire (MBTI), first published eight years earlier in 1943, the PAS aimed at understanding a deeply personal drama: the process by which every human being makes his or her own sense of self: a personality. Gittinger and his staff reviewed all known concepts and methods to identify and measure subtle childhood choices and decisions. Gradually they began to categorize personality types along three different dimensions: intellectual, procedural, and social-interpersonal. More exciting was their discovery that each life cycle goes through three different developmental stages: the “Primitive” phase from birth to about 6 years of age; the “Basic” phase from 6 to 12; and the “Contact” phase between 13 to 21. After that age, the PAS proposed, a person’s greatest work of art, their deep, hard-won sense of identity, would not usually undergo further changes. By 1962, the PAS had matured to a level of descriptive and predictive power that far exceeded anything ever imagined by John Gittinger, not to mention Freud or Jung.
In a word then, Bill and Helen helped Gittinger craft a tool for measuring key attributes of the ego-self. How ironic! And yet how perfect for paving the way for the Course and its teachings! How did that happen?
In the spring of 1965, disgusted with the competitive environment of the College of Physicians and Surgeons, Bill turned to Helen, his research associate, and said with passion, “There must be another way.” To his surprise, she responded, “I will join you to find it.”
Further into that article:
In 1951, only four years after Murphy’s somewhat rueful call for a “sharpness of definition of the individual,” Dr. William Thetford began to work with John Gittinger to help design the PAS. In 1958 Helen joined Bill. They were both funded by a grant from Psychological Assessments Associates at Columbia University.
In 1959, Dr. Marshall “Mike” Heyman wrote a three-page explanation of the whole PAS system. He described each of eight alternative “Primitive” PAS profiles (age 0-6) and the processes of both compensation and modification by which we experiment with “Basic” (6-12) and “Contact” (13 to 18-21) stages of personality development. By 1999, the highly classified system had won four decades of wide praise from use in the federal government. Heyman wrote:
“The PAS is a theory of personality which is based upon the belief that at birth, everyone has inherent predispositions toward certain kinds of intellectual, procedural and social-interpersonal styles. It is a development theory which assumes that these predispositions will be shaped through interaction with the environment. The PAS uses observable behavior and/or psychological test data in the assessment process. Its primary value lies in the fact that it [can readily be used] as a tool for the prediction of behavior.”
“The PAS proposes that personality develops simultaneously in three dimensions: an intellectual dimension, a procedural dimension and a social-interpersonal dimension.You find my commentary in Pragmatism actually takes ego development back to conception, not birth. This got me into no little trouble in a class for becoming a Licensed Practitioner for Science of Mind. Speaking of full female orgasm being an essential part of forming the initial foundation for a well-rounded ego.
,
,
Look below, in subsequent posts in this thread for me to develop bibliographic explanation of these specific Demonstrations.
I regret my collateral alignment of John GITTINGER with John the Baptist. Something still fits about it though. The Kings of Israel seemed to have a channel and John the Baptist had some kind of tie with the Temple Incense QETORET. Zachariah as High Priest, John's father went mute after spending time in the smoke-filled Holy of Holies on Yom Kippur (Day of Judgment), while he saw a divine vision. Without putting any explanation to pen I was connecting these two John's with each other as an incident of hallucinosis. Another word for channeling is Displacement Hysteria, a serious imagination disorder.
.
.
Roger RUSK wrote a book - The Other End of the World. Purely historicism, and this opened my eyes to the fallacy of futurism. RUSK describes Daniel's Cycle in astronomy around 2,520 years.
The discovery of psychotomimetic drug dosing within both the Book of Revelation, the High Priest Zachariah, John the Baptist's father and A Course in Miracles is quite key to comprehending the nature of things.
.
.
.
I still wish I had recorded that broadcast of George W. describing his prayer encounter.
As we start the Torah in a Messianic Synagogue I am finding that the congregants are still denying that Abraham and Sarah were half-siblings.It may not be accurate that Isaac was pubescent when Abraham was heeding the drive to terminate him. But just the same, the anthropomorphism to project such insecurities on God as to need such an act to confirm Abraham's faith becomes even more absurd the more I study.
Dr. Rick STRASSMAN has been invaluable even though I only have a couple comments from short conversations. His work expressed in the two books confirms that phsychotomimetic drug induced displacement hysteria is at the heart of Rapture eschatology too. The Isle of Patmos had a rye ergot infection in the grain supply, I am convinced. Another thing on my mind lately is that the complexity of a lysergic acid diethylemide molecule might mean that it is not a direct hallucinogen but rather it causes the excessive secretion of DMT.
.
.
Here are some links to buy the DMT books:
https://www.amazon.com/DMT-Molecule-.../dp/0892819278
https://www.amazon.com/DMT-Soul-Prop...FGEYCJ936QRMHD
I believe that this is the far more common rendition of A Course in Miracles, with paragraph and sentence numbers. Because of the origins in hallucinosis I prefer discussing ACIM in groups:
https://www.amazon.com/Course-Miracl...in+miracles%27
I have since learned that "John" was John GITTINGER, not Kenneth WAPNICK. This is quite fascinating validation too, how important a role ACIM played in developing profiling as we know it today. These two pioneers are scarcely associated with ACIM but they played important roles in ego mapping and also in Personality Assessment Systems. After over five years of studying ACIM for three hours a week I see clearly how Bill's and John's dosing Helen with LSD was a productive scientific experiment, all judgment aside.
.
.
In 1951, Bill began to work with John Gittinger to develop the Personality Assessment System (or PAS). In 1958, Helen joined him under a grant at Columbia College School of Physicians and Surgeons. Unlike the Myers-Briggs questionnaire (MBTI), first published eight years earlier in 1943, the PAS aimed at understanding a deeply personal drama: the process by which every human being makes his or her own sense of self: a personality. Gittinger and his staff reviewed all known concepts and methods to identify and measure subtle childhood choices and decisions. Gradually they began to categorize personality types along three different dimensions: intellectual, procedural, and social-interpersonal. More exciting was their discovery that each life cycle goes through three different developmental stages: the “Primitive” phase from birth to about 6 years of age; the “Basic” phase from 6 to 12; and the “Contact” phase between 13 to 21. After that age, the PAS proposed, a person’s greatest work of art, their deep, hard-won sense of identity, would not usually undergo further changes. By 1962, the PAS had matured to a level of descriptive and predictive power that far exceeded anything ever imagined by John Gittinger, not to mention Freud or Jung.
In a word then, Bill and Helen helped Gittinger craft a tool for measuring key attributes of the ego-self. How ironic! And yet how perfect for paving the way for the Course and its teachings! How did that happen?
In the spring of 1965, disgusted with the competitive environment of the College of Physicians and Surgeons, Bill turned to Helen, his research associate, and said with passion, “There must be another way.” To his surprise, she responded, “I will join you to find it.”
Further into that article:
In 1951, only four years after Murphy’s somewhat rueful call for a “sharpness of definition of the individual,” Dr. William Thetford began to work with John Gittinger to help design the PAS. In 1958 Helen joined Bill. They were both funded by a grant from Psychological Assessments Associates at Columbia University.
In 1959, Dr. Marshall “Mike” Heyman wrote a three-page explanation of the whole PAS system. He described each of eight alternative “Primitive” PAS profiles (age 0-6) and the processes of both compensation and modification by which we experiment with “Basic” (6-12) and “Contact” (13 to 18-21) stages of personality development. By 1999, the highly classified system had won four decades of wide praise from use in the federal government. Heyman wrote:
“The PAS is a theory of personality which is based upon the belief that at birth, everyone has inherent predispositions toward certain kinds of intellectual, procedural and social-interpersonal styles. It is a development theory which assumes that these predispositions will be shaped through interaction with the environment. The PAS uses observable behavior and/or psychological test data in the assessment process. Its primary value lies in the fact that it [can readily be used] as a tool for the prediction of behavior.”
“The PAS proposes that personality develops simultaneously in three dimensions: an intellectual dimension, a procedural dimension and a social-interpersonal dimension.
,
,
Look below, in subsequent posts in this thread for me to develop bibliographic explanation of these specific Demonstrations.
I regret my collateral alignment of John GITTINGER with John the Baptist. Something still fits about it though. The Kings of Israel seemed to have a channel and John the Baptist had some kind of tie with the Temple Incense QETORET. Zachariah as High Priest, John's father went mute after spending time in the smoke-filled Holy of Holies on Yom Kippur (Day of Judgment), while he saw a divine vision. Without putting any explanation to pen I was connecting these two John's with each other as an incident of hallucinosis. Another word for channeling is Displacement Hysteria, a serious imagination disorder.
.
.
Roger RUSK wrote a book - The Other End of the World. Purely historicism, and this opened my eyes to the fallacy of futurism. RUSK describes Daniel's Cycle in astronomy around 2,520 years.
The discovery of psychotomimetic drug dosing within both the Book of Revelation, the High Priest Zachariah, John the Baptist's father and A Course in Miracles is quite key to comprehending the nature of things.
Comment